A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
恬静的家庭电影（以及又是一条词条信息全错的Orz
虽然达妹显然不是JA翻拍最佳人选，但拍得好美，完完全全被故事打动了。立刻去看原著。
曾经打定主意不再看强调 z z z q的古装剧的，希望这是最后一部吧，除非制片公司不顾死活又制作一大批简·奥斯丁相关的影视剧。除此之外，这部影片也是一无是处，从头至尾弥漫着轻浮和肤浅的气息，美国人嘛，本来也没抱任何希望，如果他们干脆魔改到现代倒也不失他们的本质，影片会好看很多
简奥斯汀的现代爱情故事，拍摄手法reminds me of Fleabag 😉
算是灾难喜剧片，题材是好题材，但是为什么拍得食而无味弃之可惜，前面铺垫太多真的墨迹一度看不下去，中间地陷之后的内容还可以，结尾有点过于浪漫主义了，整体就很怪异，不过那对母子还有帐篷小男孩还是感动到我了。
简奥斯汀还够好莱坞再拍几十年。这一部拍得非常无聊——摇摇晃晃的镜头、不合逻辑的场景、自作聪明的台词、集体掉线的演员。女主的演技仿佛一夜回到解放前。即使是在如此"戏说"的设定下，漂亮的脸蛋也没能撑起直面镜头的独白。
轻松幽默的氛围，却在中段灾难发生后变得无趣贫弱。整部电影的丰富与精彩程度。
我看完了。我真是脸盲，Dakota 就是《恰恰丝滑》里的那位，那里面的演技真好呀。没想到还演过《五十度灰》...
太灾难了…看完甚至想找07版电影来治愈…虽然是现代化改编，却还是沿用着古代背景显得格格不入，女主自白的手法乍一看新颖，但实际用起来又格外别扭。原著最romantic的看情书到电影里就变成anne忽做感动状深情诵读，尬得让人脚趾抠地，还没有07版无声日剧跑来得有感觉。不同于原著端庄隐忍，内心又无比从容强大的anne，电影里那个耍酒疯，在社交场合毫不讳言的女人真是让人大跌眼镜……总之还是求求现代人别折腾Jane Austin的小说了，翻来覆去的现代改编都是那些浅薄的道理，完全沾不到半点原著的深刻内蕴。
看预告女主有Emma即视感，感觉Wentworth没啥存在感呢……
美国古偶、还是丑男古偶。本来是不应该拿颜值说事的，奈何这个架空历史、穿越人物、带着美国高校气息的作品，只能拿古偶标准衡量。还是大女主呢。
777
-可是现在我没房子了。”
煽情不到位，无厘头不到位，哪边都不讨好，纯无聊
刚看过女主的另一部电影，好感分是有的。不得不说这世间确实有一些解释不清楚的关联，譬如某个人与另一个人之间的缘分，浓淡与甜苦，仿佛冥冥之中。
不太懂这个故事的逻辑，如果男主那么爱女主为什么还要去撩别人？
制作其实还不错，服化道美术这些。然后通篇玩间离，一直努力打破第四堵墙。主角似乎想努力置身事外，但其实，也很难。
托斯卡尼的橄榄油一定绝佳，让见惯不怪的瑞典米其林二星大厨都惊了。
想看美食来着，但美食内容太少了，而且一帮丹麦人，跑到意大利去当厨师，这事有点搞笑
达妹的街拍造型穿越来电影既视感，以及毫无chemistry的男女主角，绝对不是我心中的劝导，却连改编都乏善可陈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
