Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
最近的片都有主演，但拍起来难看，想上格调，剧本却一塌糊涂。
确实前戏铺垫太长，高潮好像没有开始就结束了，影片节奏很慢，文戏很多，什么父子间的羁绊，家人的羁绊，兄弟的羁绊之类的套路，还有就是退役老兵复仇记其实好莱坞拍过很多次了，这次加入了关于病毒和疫苗的桥段，非常切合现在的真实背景，不免令人联想现今已经发生两年的疫情是人为造成，至于背后的凶手，估计将会又是世界未解之谜。
感觉什么都没有，没高潮，好像刚开始就结束了
想表现人性的贪婪，最终双双陨命。亮点不多，比较吸引眼球的是干燥荒芜的隔壁沙滩！
挺精致质感的作品，虽然人物行为动机设计的很SB
天降横财未必是好事 因为人人都想要个公平
预警1：路上的闲事少管，别人的事情你也少打听。
枪战很爽，很容易死人，这点加分，故事逻辑这个就很垃圾。猪脚不死也扣分。多给一颗星鼓励分。
如果男主不执意看守黄金
为啥一定要杀男主？需要他背黑锅？似乎不需要，感觉这一点没处理好，后面的剧情就变得很牵强。
节奏还可以，一个被陷害的marine被陷害然后反杀的老套故事，短小精悍
就……挺平淡的？看完了，就这？看完了，脑子中就这俩字：就这？
螳螂捕蝉，黄雀在后。为什么不相信姐妹花呢？我认为姐妹花比胖子靠谱。出色的化妆，乍一看以为是僵尸电影；废土生存的画风神似《疯狂的麦克斯》。澳大利亚的惊悚片总能给人带来惊喜。
“他们抢劫来的，是他们准备释放的病毒的解药，以便在人们的痛苦中狂捞几十亿”。还是你们美国人懂美国人。
两个贪婪的蠢批，坑填上一起回去租拖车不就行了吗?
跟某网友说的一样，明明是一个短篇剧情，非要拍成大长篇，一大堆无用的画面，拖慢整体的节奏感。
最后的枪战戏太简陋了吧，杰克鲍尔让人失望。
看来大家短评都有同感，前半部铺垫实在不错，后来生硬的转折，派恩什么事情都照规矩办了，也没有任何反叛或者质疑，为啥就用完即弃？所以，这不是老套，这是敷衍！
故事、表演、影片节奏都不错，对人心贪婪和黑暗的描写，让我看过印象深刻
千万不要活成人为财死鸟为食亡，人生区区几十年，懂得取舍才是福。这部电影虽然夸张，但却覆盖了人性，引以为戒啊！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
